TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approach

By Honglin Li, Zhenting Gao, L. Kang, Hailei Zhang, Kun Yang, Kunqian Yu, Xiaomin Luo, Weiliang Zhu, Kaixian Chen, Jianhua Shen and 2 more. Nucleic Acids Res., 2006

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

TarFisDock is a web-based tool for automating the procedure of searching for small molecule–protein interactions over a large repertoire of protein structures. It offers PDTD (potential drug target database), a target database containing 698 protein structures covering 15 therapeutic areas and a reverse ligand–protein docking program. In contrast to conventional ligand–protein docking, reverse ligand–protein docking aims to seek potential protein targets by screening an appropriate protein database. The input file of this web server is the small molecule to be tested, in standard mol2 format; TarFisDock then searches for possible binding proteins for the given small molecule by use of a docking approach. The ligand–protein interaction energy terms of the program DOCK are adopted for ranking the proteins. To test the reliability of the TarFisDock server, we searched the PDTD for putative binding proteins for vitamin E and 4H-tamoxifen. The top 2 and 10% candidates of vitamin E binding proteins identified by TarFisDock respectively cover 30 and 50% of reported targets verified or implicated by experiments; and 30 and 50% of experimentally confirmed targets for 4H-tamoxifen appear amongst the top 2 and 5% of the TarFisDock predicted candidates, respectively. Therefore, TarFisDock may be a useful tool for target identification, mechanism study of old drugs and probes discovered from natural products. TarFisDock and PDTD are available at .

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efdc1116503bcd3bebfb56c668d742126fd99bbe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Sean Ekins
  2. Jordi Mestres
  3. Bernard Testa
  4. David S. Wishart
  5. Feixiong Cheng
  6. Hualiang Jiang
  7. Georgios Spyroulias
  8. Chanjin Jung

In Molecular Biology

  1. David S. Wishart
  2. Craig Knox
  3. Anchi Guo
  4. Sean Ekins
  5. Jordi Mestres
  6. Bernard Testa
  7. Savita Shrivastava
  8. Feixiong Cheng

In Pharmacology

  1. Sean Ekins
  2. Jordi Mestres
  3. Bernard Testa
  4. Feixiong Cheng
  5. David S. Wishart
  6. Giulio Rastelli
  7. Luca Pinzi
  8. Qi Liu

Citations in the corpus