How to Design a Border Adjustment for the European Union Emissions Trading System
By S. Monjon, Philippe Quirion. 2010
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efc12ab03d700375a21fad673d45d1147e6545b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Angela Druckman
- S. Sorrell
- Mona Chitnis
- Ulrich J. Wagner
- S. Monjon
- Ralf Martin
- Mirabelle Muûls
- Tim Jackson
In Environmental Engineering
- S. Sorrell
- Mona Chitnis
- S. Monjon
- Angela Druckman
- Tim Jackson
- Ulrich J. Wagner
- Steven Firth
- Ralf Martin
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- S. Sorrell
- Mona Chitnis
- Angela Druckman
- Tim Jackson
- Steven Firth
- S. Monjon
- Mirabelle Muûls
- Philippe Quirion
Citations in the corpus
- Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? (2011, methodology): “For the EU, we take into account the substitution between clinker (the CO 2 ‐ intensive intermediate 18 Chernyavs'ka and Gullì (2002) show that the increase in electricity price can be either lower or higher than the marginal CO 2 cost.”
- On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU emissions trading scheme (2014, background): “The evident economic solution to the leakage problem is to adjust the price of goods for the implicit carbon cost when they cross the border (see e.g. Monjon and Quirion, 2010).”
- Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups (2014, background): “This is best achieved by economy-wide schemes with revenue recycling that incorporate border carbon adjustments to capture the emissions embodied in traded goods (Monjon and Quirion, 2010; van Asselt and Brewer, 2010).”