Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints
By Dominique Cappelletti, Werner Güth, M. Ploner. 2011
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efbc41becc9d042c9ea26a0cbd89bff24a1de745
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- Cary A. Deck
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer
- Anja Achtziger
- Salar Jahedi
- Alexander K. Wagner
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- Christoph Engel
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive Load in the Multi-Player Prisoner's Dilemma Game: Are There Brains in Games? (2014, unknown): “However, to our knowledge, there are only two papers which investigate the relationship between the manipulation of cognitive load and behavior in games, Roch et al. (2000) and Cappelletti et al. (2011).”
- The Effect of Cognitive Load on Economic Decision Making (2015, background): “Hauge et al. (2014) and Cappelletti et al. (2011) find that being under cognitive load does not affect generosity in the dictator and ultimatum games, respectively.”
- Money, depletion, and prosociality in the dictator game (2015, background): “Cappelletti, Güth, and Ploner (2011) observed that cognitive load, which should impair controlled processes, had no effect on behavior in an ultimatum game.”
- More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature (2013, unknown): “Cappelletti et al. (2011) show that time pressure leads to an increase in offers, whereas inducing cognitive load on decision makers does not have a significant effect on behavior compared to the standard ultimatum game.”