The Unfortunate Uselessness of Most 'State of the Art' Academic Monetary Economics
By W. Buiter. 2009
269 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efbbcabb32f2db027f0154060465b83584817053
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Stanislao Gualdi
- Francesco Zamponi
- M. Tarzia
- Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
- Martín Rapetti
- R. Frenkel
- J. Palma
- Rama Cont
Citations in the corpus
- A developing country view of the current global crisis: what should not be forgotten and what should be done (2009, background): “Among the sceptics we find Robert Solow (2008), George Ackerlof and Robert Shiller (2009), Willem Buiter (2009), Paul Krugman (2009) and Dani Rodrik (2009).”
- Macroprudential Policy - A Literature Review (2012, unknown): “Buiter (2009a) suggests two further conceptual problems with this CoVaR measure.”
- Tipping Points in Macroeconomic Agent-Based Models (2013, background): “However, they become deeply flawed in times of economic instability [12], suggesting different assumptions are needed to understand what is observed in reality.”
- The Revenge of the Market on the Rentiers: Why neo-liberal Reports of the end of history turned out to be premature (Updated 19 December 2011) (2009, background): “As Buiter (2009B) says, ‘[. . .] the typical graduate macroeconomics and monetary economics training received at Anglo-American universities during the past 30 years or so, may have set back by decades serious investigations of aggregate economic behaviour and economic policy-relevant understanding.”