The committee machine: computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural network

By Benjamin Aubin, A. Maillard, Jean Barbier, Florent Krzakala, Nicolas Macris, Lenka Zdeborov'a. 2018

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Heuristic tools from statistical physics have been used in the past to locate the phase transitions and compute the optimal learning and generalization errors in the teacher-student scenario in multi-layer neural networks. In this paper, we provide a rigorous justification of these approaches for a two-layers neural network model called the committee machine, under a technical assumption. We also introduce a version of the approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm for the committee machine that allows optimal learning in polynomial time for a large set of parameters. We find that there are regimes in which a low generalization error is information-theoretically achievable while the AMP algorithm fails to deliver it; strongly suggesting that no efficient algorithm exists for those cases, unveiling a large computational gap.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Matthieu Wyart
  2. Mario Geiger
  3. Andrew M. Saxe
  4. Stefano Spigler
  5. Lenka Zdeborov'a
  6. Florent Krzakala
  7. Sebastian Goldt
  8. Madhu S. Advani

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Lenka Zdeborov'a
  2. Florent Krzakala
  3. Mario Geiger
  4. Kyle Cranmer
  5. I. Cirac
  6. Leslie Vogt-Maranto
  7. Jean Barbier
  8. Laurent Daudet

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Stefano Spigler
  2. Mario Geiger
  3. Matthieu Wyart
  4. Jean Barbier
  5. Naftali Tishby
  6. Lenka Zdeborov'a
  7. Nicolas Macris
  8. Florent Krzakala

Citations in the corpus