Why is corruption less harmful in some countries than in others
By K. Blackburn, Gonzalo F. Forgues-Puccio. 2009
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef93ec1e3f1af92ef688f5ec3294977d7ceff820
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Information Systems
- C. Ramlogan-Dobson
- Sorin M. S. Krammer
- Jing You
- Yuanyuan Wang
- A. Andrés
- Simplice A. Asongu
- Alfredo Jiménez
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Corruption and firm growth: Evidence from China☆ (2012, background): “4A few theoretical papers have also attempted to explain the puzzle of high levels of corruption but fast economic growth in "East Asian paradox" countries (see Blackburn and Forgues-Puccio, 2009; Blackburn and Wang, 2009).”
- Is Corruption Really Bad for Inequality? Evidence from Latin America (2011, background): “Bourguignon and Verdier (2000), however, predict a non-monotonic relationship between democracy (a proxy for corruption) and inequality.”
- Do political connections matter for firm innovation? Evidence from emerging markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe (2020, unknown): “13 innovations, especially radical ones (Blackburn and Forgues-Puccio, 2009).”
- Greasing the Wheels of Change: Bribery, Institutions, and New Product Introductions in Emerging Markets (2019, background): “Moreover, mimetic pressures from high-performing firms towards their competitors will increase a bribe’s ability to deliver the sought-after gains by creating incentives for bureaucrats to organize and coordinate these informal transactions (Blackburn and Forgues-Puccio, 2009).”