Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Terms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence (2020, background): “At the most extreme, inclusion paints as irrational any form of resistance that does not accept, in the first place, the legitimacy of such a future (see TallBear, 2013).”
Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2019, unknown): “ace" to describe genetic ancestrywithinbiomedicalresearch[40,49,84,122],whileothershavecriticizedtheuseofdirect-to-consumergenetictesting and its implications for racial and ethnic identiﬁcation [15, 91, 113]. [59, 63]. Genetic ancestry testing has been criticized for its potentialtopromotebiol”
Genomic articulations of indigeneity (2013, methodology): “DNA evidence is then used to fulfill a longer standing requirement for tribal ‘enrollment’ or citizenship: biological descent from an enrolled tribal member (TallBear, 2013).”