BRIEF REPORT Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance‐avoidance hypothesis

By K. Mogg, B. Bradley, Felicity J Miles, R. Dixon. 2004

521 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety (2008, background): “However, trait anxious individuals demonstrated avoidance of threatening pictorial stimuli only at 1500 ms, while responding faster to probes in the same location as threat stimuli presented for 500 ms (Mogg et al., 2004).”
Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, unknown): “some human studies, pictorial stimuli have been used [259-261].”
Mechanisms of Attentional Biases towards Threat in the Anxiety Disorders: An Integrative Review (2009, background): “…recent empirical phenomenon in which attention is preferentially allocated towards locations opposite the location of the threat cue, thus indicating avoidance of the threat cue (e.g., Koster, Crombez, Vershuere, Van Damme, & Wiersema, 2006; Koster, Verschuere, et al., 2005; Mogg et al., 2004).”