Effect of Distance-Related Heterogeneity on Population Size Estimates from Point Counts

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When can we ignore the problem of imperfect detection in comparative studies? (2012, methodology): “Finally, methods such as distance sampling (Buckland et al. 1993; Nichols et al. 2000) and spatial capture–recapture methods (Efford & Dawson 2009) that account for detectability without requiring replicating counts should also be considered.”
Calibrating indices of avian density from non‐standardized survey data: making the most of a messy situation (2013, background): “Removal models produce density estimates that vary widely with changes in the survey radius (Reidy, Thompson & Bailey 2011) and will only yield unbiased estimates of density when q = 1 (Efford & Dawson 2009).”