Missing Data Imputation for Supervised Learning

By Jason Poulos, Rafael Valle. 2016

74 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT Missing data imputation can help improve the performance of prediction models in situations where missing data hide useful information. This paper compares methods for imputing missing categorical data for supervised classification tasks. We experiment on two machine learning benchmark datasets with missing categorical data, comparing classifiers trained on non-imputed (i.e., one-hot encoded) or imputed data with different levels of additional missing-data perturbation. We show imputation methods can increase predictive accuracy in the presence of missing-data perturbation, which can actually improve prediction accuracy by regularizing the classifier. We achieve results comparable to the state-of-the-art on the Adult dataset with missing-data perturbation and -nearest-neighbors (-NN) imputation.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Nicolas Papernot
  2. Nicholas Carlini
  3. Kunal Talwar
  4. Florian Tramèr
  5. Ian J. Goodfellow
  6. Ú. Erlingsson
  7. Dawn Song
  8. Percy Liang

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Anil S. Jadhav
  2. Ian J. Goodfellow
  3. Ú. Erlingsson
  4. Krishnan Ramanathan
  5. Nicolas Papernot
  6. Kunal Talwar
  7. Dhanya Pramod

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Anil S. Jadhav
  2. Ian J. Goodfellow
  3. Ú. Erlingsson
  4. Martín Abadi
  5. Krishnan Ramanathan
  6. Nicolas Papernot
  7. Kunal Talwar
  8. Dhanya Pramod

Citations in the corpus