Multiscale modelling of nanomechanics and micromechanics: an overview

By Nasr Ghoniem, E. Busso, Nicholas Kioussis, Han-Chen Huang. 2003

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef8471f60c2dcad6f1f9dc7878e042c2e1ed114a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Qiang Lu
2. R. Khare
3. Sulin Zhang
4. Zhuping Huang
5. B. Karihaloo
6. Jianxiang Wang
7. Ted Belytschko
8. Huiling Duan

In Materials Chemistry

1. Qiang Lu
2. Jianxiang Wang
3. Huiling Duan
4. Zhuping Huang
5. Sulin Zhang
6. Ted Belytschko
7. R. Khare
8. B. Karihaloo

Citations in the corpus

• Eshelby formalism for nano-inhomogeneities (2005, background): “However, for nanostructured materials (Gleiter 2000; Ghoniem et al. 2003) and nanochannel-array materials (Masuda & Fukuda 1995; Pokropivnyi 2002; Gu et al. 2004; Martin & Siwy 2004) with a large ratio of the surface/interface region to the bulk, the surface/interface effect can be substantial.”
• A bridging domain and strain computation method for coupled atomistic–continuum modelling of solids (2007, methodology): “Differences in the available coupling methods are the specifics of the coupling strategies, which have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [9–11].”