Theory and application of the Day plot (Mrs/Ms versus Hcr/Hc) 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data

By D. Dunlop. 2002

1,451 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Geophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef70ae2d534b340bba7a3d2595ffa50a817837a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. A. Roberts
2. D. Heslop
3. Xiang Zhao
4. J. Larrasoaña
5. C. R. Pike
6. Liao Chang
7. M. Dekkers
8. C. Peters

In Geophysics

1. A. Roberts
2. D. Heslop
3. Xiang Zhao
4. Liao Chang
5. C. R. Pike
6. J. Larrasoaña
7. Andrew J. Newell
8. F. Florindo

In Molecular Biology

1. A. Roberts
2. D. Heslop
3. Xiang Zhao
4. Liao Chang
5. J. Larrasoaña
6. C. R. Pike
7. Andrew J. Newell
8. F. Florindo

Citations in the corpus

• Selected room temperature magnetic parameters as a function of mineralogy, concentration and grain size (2003, background): “Theoretical aspects of the Day et al. (1977) biplot, including the influence of SP grains, are discussed by Dunlop (2002) .”
• Resolving the Origin of Pseudo‐Single Domain Magnetic Behavior (2017, background): “In Figures 3c–3f, FORC diagrams are shown for magnetite with particle size from the MD through PSD size range from 76 to 7 μm (Muxworthy & Dunlop, 2002).”
• First-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams for pseudo-single-domain magnetites at high temperature (2002, neutral): “…ti sa ti on (a rb it ra ry u ni ts ) 450 500 550 600 650 Temperature (˚C) W(7 μm) Tc = 584˚C 0.001 0.01 0.1 M R S / M S 1 10 HCR /HC Mixing curves of Dunlop (2002a) MD PSD Wright Hydrothermal Hc (mT) Hc (mT)Hc (mT) Hc (mT) H u (m T) (a) (b) (d)(c) -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60 80 1000 20 40…”
• A high‐precision model of first‐order reversal curve (FORC) functions for single‐domain ferromagnets with uniaxial anisotropy (2005, methodology): “Suites of samples with varying ratios of components often follow trends on the Day plot [Parry, 1982; Jackson, 1990; Tauxe et al., 1996; Dunlop, 2002a, 2002b].”
• Understanding fine magnetic particle systems through use of first‐order reversal curve diagrams (2014, methodology): “…1994; Kruiver et al., 2001; Heslop et al., 2002; Egli, 2004]; much useful information can be obtained from these profiles [e.g., Muxworthy and Dunlop, 2002; Carvallo et al., 2006a; Rowan and Roberts, 2006; Geiss et al., 2008] and by unmixing or other analyses to understand central ridge…”
• Searching for single domain magnetite in the “pseudo‐single‐domain” sedimentary haystack: Implications of biogenic magnetite preservation for sediment magnetism and relative paleointensity determinations (2012, background): “Low-resolution FORC diagrams reveal details of the terrigenous component, which has characteristics that are consistent with those of ‘PSD’ magnetite, particularly the asymmetrical distribution that diverges toward the Bb axis in the upper quadrant [Roberts et al., 2000; Muxworthy and Dunlop, 2002].”