ClermonTyping: an easy-to-use and accurate in silico method for Escherichia genus strain phylotyping

By J. Beghain, Antoine Bridier-Nahmias, Hervé Le Nagard, E. Denamur, O. Clermont. Microbial Genomics, 2018

553 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The genus Escherichia is composed of Escherichia albertii, E. fergusonii, five cryptic Escherichia clades and E. coli sensu stricto. Furthermore, the E. coli species can be divided into seven main phylogroups termed A, B1, B2, C, D, E and F. As specific lifestyles and/or hosts can be attributed to these species/phylogroups, their identification is meaningful for epidemiological studies. Classical phenotypic tests fail to identify non-sensu stricto E. coli as well as phylogroups. Clermont and colleagues have developed PCR assays that allow the identification of most of these species/phylogroups, the triplex/quadruplex PCR for E. coli phylogroup determination being the most popular. With the growing availability of whole genome sequences, we have developed the ClermonTyping method and its associated web-interface, the ClermonTyper, that allows a given strain sequence to be assigned to E. albertii, E. fergusonii, Escherichia clades I–V, E. coli sensu stricto as well as to the seven main E. coli phylogroups. The ClermonTyping is based on the concept of in vitro PCR assays and maintains the principles of ease of use and speed that prevailed during the development of the in vitro assays. This in silico approach shows 99.4 % concordance with the in vitro PCR assays and 98.8 % with the Mash genome-clustering tool. The very few discrepancies result from various errors occurring mainly from horizontal gene transfers or SNPs in the primers. We propose the ClermonTyper as a freely available resource to the scientific community at: http://clermontyping.iame-research.center/.

Subfields: Ecology, Endocrinology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef6dbc750bcffe68da80fb350d6554704ad451f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Yulei Fan
  2. Ole Lund
  3. Nabil-Fareed Alikhan
  4. F. Scheutz
  5. Zhemin Zhou
  6. Mark Achtman
  7. K. Mohamed
  8. Morten Nielsen

Citations in the corpus