Numerical simulation of droplets, bubbles and waves: state of the art

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The granular column collapse as a continuum: validity of a two-dimensional Navier–Stokes model with a μ(I)-rheology (2011, methodology): “This scheme has been validated for numerous problems with variable viscosity such as two-phase flows of Newtonian fluids with different properties (Fuster et al. 2009a,b; Popinet 2009; Bagué et al. 2010), as well as generalized Newtonian fluids (Popinet 2005) including yield-stress rheologies…”
Multiscale simulations of primary atomization (2010, methodology): “Particles alter flow dynamics leading to attenuation or enhancement of turbulence based on a non-dimensional particle momentum number [13, 14].”
Air entrainment and bubble statistics in breaking waves (2016, unknown): “Three dimensional simulations of breaking waves have recently become available, both DNS (Fuster et al. 2009) and LES (Derakhti & Kirby 2014; Lubin & Glockner 2015).”
Numerical Models of Surface Tension (2018, background): “Details can be found in e.g. (Torres & Brackbill 2000, Herrmann 2008, Fuster et al. 2009).”
Capillary effects on wave breaking (2015, methodology): “This solver has been used recently to study complex phenomena involving multiphase flow, like atomization processes (Fuster et al. 2009; Agbaglah et al. 2011).”
Dynamics of laser-induced bubble pairs (2015, methodology): “It is a robust method for following evolving, topologically complex interfaces (Fuster et al. 2009) as encountered with interacting bubbles.”