A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

By T. Groseclose. 2001

765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef4670f1b1d82bb0e28fd29a9d36bac2538611bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition (2007, neutral): “The term ‘valence’ has since been used as a proxy for leadership ratings allowing for leverage over electoral strategy (Groseclose, 2001; Schofield, 2004), for candidate trustworthiness and honesty (Enelow and Hinich, 1982) and for economic performance ratings (Whiteley, 1984).”
A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers (2005, background): “3 characteristics, such as “valence” or “charisma,” has been recognized by the theoretical literature (see, e.g., Aragones and Palfrey (2002) and Groseclose (2001)), the empirical literature has net yet incorporated politicians’ unobserved heterogeneity into the analysis of their career choices.”
How Do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign (2013, neutral): “This paper is related to a vast literature on candidate’s valence, initiated by Stokes (1963) and including Enelow and Hinich (1982), Ansolabehere and Snyder (2000), Groseclose (2001), Schofield (2003), Aragones and Palfrey (2002) among others.”
The Mean Voter Theorem: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Convergent Equilibrium (2007, neutral): “Ansolabehere and Snyder (2000), Groseclose (2001), and Aragones and Palfrey (2002, 2005).”
When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms (2013, background): “…characteristics such as integrity, competence, collaboration or problem-solving skills that voters value in their own right (Adams et al. 2011; Groseclose 2001; Stokes 1963, 1992; Stone and Simas 2010).1 Previous work demonstrates that election outcomes are responsive to variation in…”
Competition between Specialized Candidates (2010, background): “, Ansolabehere and Snyder (2 000), Groseclose (2001), Aragones and Palfrey (2002)), the candidates’ fixed characteristic is a q u lity parameter that enters additively in all voters’ utility functions.”