Evidence of resource partitioning between humpback and minke whales around the western Antarctic Peninsula

By Ari S. Friedlaender, G. Lawson, Patrick N. Halpin. 2009

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef3ad88d7563e0f92b4eb4a38880c68b7874f216

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. John Calambokidis
2. J. Goldbogen
3. A. Stimpert
4. B. Southall
5. S. DeRuiter
6. E. Hazen
7. Ari S. Friedlaender

In Ecology

1. John Calambokidis
2. Ari S. Friedlaender
3. J. Goldbogen
4. G. Ballard
5. A. Stimpert
6. D. Ainley
7. B. Southall
8. S. DeRuiter

In Oceanography

1. John Calambokidis
2. J. Goldbogen
3. A. Stimpert
4. B. Southall
5. S. DeRuiter
6. W. Smith
7. E. Hazen
8. Ari S. Friedlaender

Citations in the corpus

• Prey density and distribution drive the three‐dimensional foraging strategies of the largest filter feeder (2015, methodology): “…research has revealed a wide range of dynamic foraging strategies in several of the largest ror- qual species including blue, fin and humpback whales (Friedlaender et al. 2009; Doniol-Valcroze et al. 2011; Wi- ley et al. 2011; Simon, Johnson & Madsen 2012; Goldbo- gen et al. 2013a; Kot et al.…”
• Trophic cascades in the western Ross Sea, Antarctica: revisited (2015, background): “The depth of minke whale foraging is certainly affected by the depth of their prey and appeared to average well within our prey sampling zone to 90 m (Friedlaender et al. 2014), even if the depth at which prey (krill) aggregate in the presence of whales becomes deeper (Friedlaender et al. 2009).”