Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength

By T. Taipale, M. Österberg, A. Nykänen, J. Ruokolainen, J. Laine. 2010

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From paper to nanopaper: evolution of mechanical and physical properties (2014, background): “Nevertheless, deterioration in draining capacity of papermaking slurries has been argued as a drawback for NFC-reinforced papers (Ahola et al. 2008; Taipale et al. 2010; González et al. 2012, 2013a, b).”
Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps (2012, methodology): “NFC has previously been used in the fabrication of films that proved to be stronger than paper (Taniguchi and Okamura 1998).”
Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications (2013, background): “[169] showed that the addition of NFC decreased the drainage rate of pulp suspension and increased the strength of paper, especially if a cationic polyelectrolyte is used as a retention aid.”
Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review (2016, methodology): “Only a few scholars such as Tanaka et al. (2012) have used this method to analyse the particle size of nanocellulose.”
Cellulose nanofibrils: Challenges and possibilities as a paper additive or coating material – A review (2014, methodology): “Both Hii et al. (2012) and Taipale et al. (2010) used retention aid to deposit the CNF on fibres before sheet forming.”