Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs
By Fabrizio Scarpa, P. Panayiotou, G. Tomlinson. 2000
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Polymers and Plastics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef1e4afa01944d6450d3850bbc98e211de38e18b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanical Engineering
- Fabrizio Scarpa
- Jinsong Leng
- Yanju Liu
- Massimo Ruzzene
- C. Lira
- R. Rajasekaran
- Christopher W. Smith
- Murtaza Najabat Ali
In Polymers and Plastics
- Jinsong Leng
- Fabrizio Scarpa
- Yanju Liu
- Massimo Ruzzene
- R. Rajasekaran
- C. Lira
- A. Bezazi
- Kenneth E. Evans
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Behavior of auxetic structures under compression and impact forces (2017, methodology): “The work of Ruzzene et al and Scarpa et al is highly commendable in this regard [24, 25].”
- In-plane elasticity of a novel auxetic honeycomb design (2017, background): “A variety of honeycomb configurations achieving positive/negative/zero Poisson’s ratio have been proposed and investigated with special focus on the in-plane mechanics, flatwise compressive strength and the transverse shear modulus [9-25].”
- Flexible Skins for Morphing Aircraft Using Cellular Honeycomb Cores (2010, background): “Although some figures provided in this article are available in the literature (Gibson and Ashby, 1997; Scarpa et al., 2000), they are presented here to examine how variations in cell geometric parameters would simultaneously affect the in-plane stiffnesses, outof-plane deflections, and the maximum…”
- A novel centresymmetric honeycomb composite structure (2005, methodology): “For increasing cell wall aspect ratios a, both the in-plane Poisson s ratio m12 and the Young s modulus ratio decrease, while the limiting internal cell angle h augments accordingly with the a sin(a/2) rule [3].”