Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate.
By Josef Coresh, B. Astor, G. Mcquillan, J. Kusek, Tom Greene, F. van Lente, A. Levey. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2002
743 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nephrology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef1a1fb614c61667cc1b1c8569d7fff3707e9ee9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nephrology
Citations in the corpus
- Multiple New Loci Associated with Kidney Function and Chronic Kidney Disease: The CKDGen consortium (2010, neutral): “To account for between-laboratory variation across studies, serum creatinine was calibrated to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) standards in all studies (including replication cohorts) as described previousl”
- Multiple Novel Loci are Associated with Indices of Renal Function and Chronic Kidney Disease (2009, methodology): “To be comparable across studies, creatinine values in all studies were calibrated using regression to age- and sex-adjusted mean values from a nationally representative US survey as described previousl”
- Level of kidney function as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes in the community. (2003, result): “Because both NHANES III and ARIC were designed as representative samples of the population, and NHANES III data have been directly compared with the MDRD samples (11), it was assumed that the mean serum creatinine for a given age, gender, and race should be comparable in the two studies.”
- Relations of serum phosphorus and calcium levels to the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the community. (2007, background): “33 μmol/L).(20) Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting blood glucose level of 126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L) or higher or the use of insulin or any hypoglycemic agents.”
- The Metabolic Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease in U.S. Adults (2004, methodology): “Serum creatinine level was calibrated for measurement variance between NHANES III and MDRD clinical laboratories (18).”
- Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. (2006, background): “This calibration error is relatively greater and contributes to larger uncertainty in GFR estimates at lower creatinine values near the upper limit of the reference interval (20) .”
- Performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease. (2005, methodology): “(14), this illustrates that calibration errors can greatly distort the interpretation of creatinine-based equations in the normal range of SCr.”
- Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence, and trends among U.S. adults, 1999 to 2000. (2004, methodology): “To minimize the impact of these limitations, we used a newly developed equation with increased precision of estimating GFR and calibrated the serum creatinine measurements to the laboratory that generated the data for development of this equation (19).”
- National Kidney Foundation Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification (2003, background): “Differences among clinical laboratories in calibration of serum creatinine assays can account for errors in GFR estimates as high as 20%, which are especially important in individuals with near-normal serum creatinine concentration (39, 40 ).”
- 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. (2008, methodology): “4) from the NHANES III values, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated based on serum creatinine level using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula.(24,25) We assigned an eGFR value of 200 mL/min/1.”
- Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States (2011, methodology): “Values from NHANES III and NHANES 1999-2000 were calibrated as previously described to account for laboratory drift in serum creatinine concentrations across NHANES cycles.(16,18-20) The GFR was estimated from calibrated serum creatinine concentrations using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology C”
- Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. (2004, methodology): “Serum creatinine in the MDRD study and subsequently in a subset of individuals included in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) both were analyzed at the Cleveland Clinic laboratory (24).”
- Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. (2007, methodology): “Proper use of GFR estimating equations requires a known calibration of the serum creatinine (Scr) assays (7, 8).”