Photophysiology of the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH8102, a new model organism

By Christophe Six, J. Thomas, B. Brahamsha, Y. Lemoine, Frédéric Partensky. 2004

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contrasting photoacclimation costs in ecotypes of the marine eukaryotic picoplankter Ostreococcus (2008, methodology): “Light experiments were conducted over irradiances ranging from 5 mmol photons m22 s21 to 800 mmol photons m22 s21 adjusted with neutral density filters (LEE Filters, Panavision), as described by Six et al. (2004) and Rodrı́guez et al. (2005).”
Taxonomic Discrimination of Phytoplankton by Spectral Fluorescence (2010, background): “…preferential loss of phycobilins relative to Chla with increasing irradiance in nutrient-replete cryptophytes (Lewitus and Caron 1990; Sciandra et al. 2000; Hammer et al. 2002) and cyanobacteria (Table 2) and a preferential loss of PE over PC in the latter (Kana and Glibert 1987; Six et al. 2004).”
Evidence for aggregation and export of cyanobacteria and nano-eukaryotes from the Sargasso Sea euphotic zone (2010, methodology): “…as the indicator pigment 19’-hex was used in the calculations) were used to directly estimate the POC export flux of these organisms (Synechococcus; Liu et al., 1998; Six et al., 2004; Prochlorococcus; Moore et al., 1995; Bertilsson et al., 2003; nano-eukaryotes; Llewellyn and Gibb, 2000).”