The Impact of Missing Labels and Overlapping Sound Events on Multi-label Multi-instance Learning for Sound Event Classification

By Maarten Meire, P. Karsmakers, L. Vuegen. 2019

6 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Automated analysis of complex scenes of everyday sounds might help us navigate within the enormous amount of data and help us make better decisions based on the sounds around us. For this purpose classification models are required that translate raw audio to meaningful event labels. The specific task that this paper targets is that of learning sound event classifier models by a set of example sound segments that contain multiple potentially overlapping sound events and that are labeled with multiple weak sound event class names. This involves a combination of both multi-label and multi-instance learning. This paper investigates two state-of-the-art methodologies that allow this type of learning, low-resolution multi-label non-negative matrix deconvolution (LRM-NMD) and CNN. Besides comparing the accuracy in terms of correct sound event classifications, also the robustness to missing labels and to overlap of the sound events in the sound segments is evaluated. For small training set sizes LRM-NMD clearly outperforms CNN with an accuracy that is 40 to 50% higher. LRM-NMD does only mi-norly suffer from overlapping sound events during training while CNN suffers a substantial drop in classification accuracy, in the order of 10 to 20%, when sound events have a 100% overlap. Both methods show good robustness to missing labels. No matter how many labels are missing in a single segment (that contains multiple sound events) CNN converges to 97% accuracy when enough training data is available. LRM-NMD on the other hand shows a slight performance drop when the amount of missing labels increases.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Xavier Serra
  2. Eduardo Fonseca
  3. Frederic Font
  4. Xavier Favory
  5. Jordi Pons
  6. Manoj Plakal
  7. D. Ellis
  8. Aren Jansen

In Signal Processing

  1. Xavier Serra
  2. Eduardo Fonseca
  3. Frederic Font
  4. Xavier Favory
  5. Jordi Pons
  6. D. Ellis
  7. Manoj Plakal
  8. Aren Jansen

Citations in the corpus