Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s
By P. Messerlin. 2001
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eec59d542e2648a5c72102c9a2c238841b8740ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Agricultural trade liberalization and economic development: the role of downstream market power (2007, background): “Spencer and Jones (1992), Ishikawa and Spencer 5 Messerlin (2001) does acknowledge that a few large traders in grains and sugar could result in imperfect competition in these subsectors, and that there may be imperfect competition at the food retailing level.”
- EU Trade Policy as Protection for Exporters: The Agreements with Mexico and Chile (2007, unknown): “For one, so far exporter lobbying has been largely neglected in explanations of the EU’s pursuit of preferential trade agreements, with studies stressing the importance of foreign policy objectives instead (Messerlin, 2001, p. 200; Sapir, 1998).”
- Harmonisation of food regulations and trade in the Single Market: evidence from disaggregated data (2006, unknown): “Messerlin (2001) computed the tariff equivalents of crude NTBs for the EU.”
- Rigged Rules and Double Standards: Trade, Globalisation, and the Fight Against Poverty (2002, unknown): “1 per cent if tariffs alone are included, to 9 per cent if both tariff and non-tariff barriers are taken into account (Messerlin 2001).”