Host plant associations in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): insights from molecular phylogeography

By M. Navajas. Experimental & applied acarology, 2004

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evidence for synonymy between Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari, Prostigmata, Tetranychidae): Review and new data (2013, unknown): “While most of the molecular studies conclude that the two forms are syn-onymous (Navajas, 1998; Hinomoto et al. , 2001; de Mendonça et al. , 2011; Sun et al. , 2012) or do not achieve to separate them (Xie et al. , 2006b; Xie et al. , 2008), a recent work wrapped up to the validity of this species…”
Molecular markers for the phylogenetics of mites and ticks (2002, methodology): “Navajas et al. (1996b) used this gene to resolve relationships between genera in two subfamilies of the Tetranychidae.”
Effect of ground-cover management on spider mites and their phytoseiid natural enemies in clementine mandarin orchards (II): Top-down regulation mechanisms (2011, background): “urticae populations could be a mixture of genuine polyphagous individuals or a collection of host specialists (Navajas, 1998).”