Learning about Canonical Views from Internet Image Collections
By Elad Mezuman, Yair Weiss. 2012
29 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Jitendra Malik
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Li Fei-Fei
Citations in the corpus
- Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networks (2015, methodology): “After seventh layer, another fully connected layer is used to predict class labels.”
- Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations? (2018, neutral): “Consistent with previous results on "dataset bias" [37, 33, 2, 44, 45, 32] we find that the ImageNet dataset is not invariant to translations and rescalings.”
- On the "steerability" of generative adversarial networks (2019, background): “Dataset biases partly comes from human preferences in taking photos: we typically capture images in specific “canonical” views that are not fully representative of the entire visual world [19, 12].”
- Learning visual biases from human imagination (2014, methodology): “We extend ideas [24] to use computer vision to analyze these biases.”
- Learning Where to Look: Data-Driven Viewpoint Set Selection for 3D Scenes (2017, background): “Internet image collections of particular objects were shown to mirror canonical viewpoint preferences by people [24].”
- Concept Generalization in Visual Representation Learning (2020, unknown): “We need these datasets to have diverse object-level images [2] and to be as less biased as possible, e.g., towards canonical views [39].”
- Learning Everything about Anything: Webly-Supervised Visual Concept Learning (2014, background): “While the results are not perfect, the top ranked images for most queries tend to be very relevant [32].”