Carnivore demography and the consequences of changes in prey availability

By T. Fuller, P. Sievert. 2001

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee9b1bf8d42c22256812d5bd1a2787b5788554b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The role of human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolves (2016, background): “Such constraining factors of habitat tolerance are the same for most large carnivore species (Woodroffe and Ginsberg, 1998; Fuller and Sievert, 2001).”
Insights into wolf presence in human‐dominated landscapes: the relative role of food availability, humans and landscape attributes (2012, background): “…persistence of large carnivores seem to be modulated by strong interactions among factors that affect reproductive rates, such as food availability (Fuller & Sievert, 2001; Basille et al., 2009), and factors that affect survival such as human activity or landscape context, which can reduce human…”
Food habits of sympatric jaguars and pumas across a gradient of human disturbance (2010, background): “Their survival is jeopardized by reductions in prey availability, either through direct competition with humans or indirectly through habitat loss (Fuller & Sievert, 2001).”
Paleoecology of the large carnivore guild from the late Pleistocene of Argentina (2006, background): “…was found for several carnivores in different hab− itats (e.g., Bertram 1979; Handy and Biggot 1979; Macdon− ald 1983; East 1984; Creel et al. 2001; Fuller and Sievert 2001; Carbone and Gittleman 2002; Höner et al. 2005), which is an important observation for the imbalance hypoth− esis of Fariña…”
Female wolverine (Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability (2005, background): “Accordingly, food availability affects reproductive rates in many carnivore species (Kirkpatrick 1988; Boertje and Stephenson 1992; White and Ralls 1993; Fuller and Sievert 2001).”
Assessing global patterns in mammalian carnivore occupancy and richness by integrating local camera trap surveys (2017, background): “Despite these limitations, our research still supported the vital role prey populations play in maintaining carnivore communities across a broad range of ecosystems (Carbone & Gittleman, 2002; Fuller & Sievert, 2001).”
Flexible habitat selection by cougars in response to anthropogenic development (2014, background): “Populations of large terrestrial carnivores are especially susceptible to anthropogenic landscape change due to habitat alteration and reduced populations of prey (Noss et al., 1996; Fuller and Sievert, 2001; Sunquist and Sunquist, 2001; Karanth et al., 2004), and because conflict with people freque”
Carrying capacity of large African predators : Predictions and tests (2007, background): “Although the basis of these relationships is sound (Fuller and Sievert, 2001), like previous analyses, only leopard, and perhaps that of lion, is good enough for unrestrained support.”
PREY PREFERENCES OF THE AFRICAN WILD DOG LYCAON PICTUS (CANIDAE: CARNIVORA): ECOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSERVATION (2006, background): “Prey abundance is known to influence carnivore demography (Fuller and Sievert 2001); however, with the more detailed understanding of preferred prey presented here, our power to predict carrying capacity, minimum viable population sizes, and area requirements is likely to increase.”
Influence of harvest, climate and wolf predation on Yellowstone elk, 1961‐2004 (2005, unknown): “However, the widespread tendency for carnivore and prey populations to be positively correlated (over time and across space, Fuller and Sievert 2001), may indicate that predator equilibria are importantly determined by prey equilibria, rather than the reverse.”
Responses of ‘resistant’ vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: the importance of niche breadth and range boundaries (2003, background): “…the predicted values were well within the range of values observed for extant species (Table 4) suggests that factors such as reductions in prey (Fuller & Sievert 2001) or mortality due to increased contact with humans (Johnson et al. 2001) may have been more important in the disappearance of…”