The Battle for Employment Guarantee

By Reetika Khera. 2011

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee93d4e41eb1175eb75670e959eac789ea8d9a84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Welfare and Poverty Impacts of India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: Evidence from Andhra Pradesh (2013, background): “…all the state’s administrative units.4 These features, many of which were subsequently incorporated into the national regulations for program implementation, have led the state to be considered one of a few ‘star performers’ in terms of the quality of program implementation (Dreze and Khera 2011).”
To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations (2010, background): “Making that right real across national space will be a long hard struggle (Dreze and Khera 2009).”
Labor Market Effects of Social Programs: Evidence from India's Employment Guarantee (2015, background): “In this second group of states, lack of administrative capacity and rampant corruption hampered public employment delivery, despite large potential demand (Khera, 2011; Dutta et al., 2012).”
Does India's Employment Guarantee Scheme Guarantee Employment? (2012, background): “Several studies have found that the work application process and the system for recording demand for work is not yet in place (see, for example, Khera 2011).”
Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Development: Evidence from India (2016, background): “7 Note that the program, by design, excludes cities. work outside the home, reduced (economic) distress migration, and smoothed economic insecurity during drought or other economic downturns (Dutta et al. 2014; Khera 2011; MoRD 2013, 2014; Muralidharan, Niehaus, and Sukhtankar 2016).”