Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes

By P. Newton, Arun Agrawal, L. Wollenberg. 2013

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Recent cropping frequency, expansion, and abandonment in Mato Grosso, Brazil had selective land characteristics (2014, background): “…such as satellite monitoring of deforestation, municipalities black-listed from selling agricultural products, government credit limitations, and voluntary agreements to prevent soy and beef sales from recently deforested land (Nepstad et al 2009, Soares-Filho et al 2010, Newton et al 2013).”
Envisioning REDD+ in a post‐Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice (2017, background): “, cocoa and coffee) may be integrated in REDD +.(110,122) If REDD+ will be able to establish relationships with other markets and financial instruments, its impacts can be significant.”
System complexity and policy integration challenges: The Brazilian Energy- Water-Food Nexus (2019, background): “They result from a coordinated effort between local governments, producers, consumer groups, others directly involved in commodity supply-chains and civil society groups [60].”
Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero‐Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? (2016, background): “…the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. their successes and shortcomings, and opens the door to greenwashing (Rudorff et al. 2011; Newton et al. 2013; Gibbs et al. 2015).”