Comparison of particle packing models for proportioning concrete constitutents for minimum voids ratio

By Martyn Jones, Li Zheng, M. Newlands. 2002

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee7f53006fbb15ba7320d3722586605282239a66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. J. Walraven
2. Mijia Yang
3. S. Fennis

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. J. Walraven
2. Mijia Yang
3. S. Fennis

Citations in the corpus

• Use of bacterial cell walls to improve the mechanical performance of concrete (2013, background): “Second, CaCO3 can fill the void in concrete, decrease porosity, and improve the particle packing efficiency, thereby making concrete dense and increasing the compressive strength as described in the particle packing model [23].”
• Using particle packing technology for sustainable concrete mixture design (2012, methodology): “…interested in using one of the currently available models, reference is made to Europack [Idorn, 1995; Toufar et al., 1976], MixSim [Dewar, 1999; Jones et al., 2002; mixsim.net], 4C-Packing [dti.dk; Glavind et al., 1999], Compressible Packing Model [Larrard, 1999; RENE LCPC or BETONLABPRO via…”
• Water demand of amorphous nano silica and its impact on the workability of cement paste (2012, unknown): “This fi nding is in line with the theories of improved particle packing of continuously graded mixes [1,5,26 – 28, 30, 31, 33, 37, 48].”