On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

By Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, 2005

388 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee7a20580e84c8549289c646a5f92f568903fe0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Paul E. S. Dunne
2. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
3. Sanjay Modgil
4. Matthias Thimm
5. Henry Prakken

Citations in the corpus

• Argumentation in artificial intelligence (2007, background): “—[50,53,54]—wherein the relation “the argument x supports the argument y” is introduced leading to the formulation of bipolar argumentation frameworks.”
• DART: a Dataset of Arguments and their Relations on Twitter (2016, neutral): “…are annotated with the relations connecting them, either a positive relation (i.e., a support relation in abstract bipolar argumentation (Cayrol and Lagasquie-Schiex, 2005)) a negative relation (i.e., an attack relation in abstract argumentation (Dung, 1995)), or an unrelated relation.”