The 6.5-day wave and its seasonal variability in the middle and upper atmosphere

By Han-Li Liu, E. Talaat, R. Roble, R. Lieberman, D. Riggin, J. Yee. 2004

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ionospheric variability due to planetary waves and tides for solar minimum conditions (2010, background): “On the one hand, even though planetary waves can propagate up to the mesosphere and may even amplify due to instability [Plumb, 1983;Meyer and Forbes, 1997; Liu et al., 2004], further upward propa-”
Thermosphere extension of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (2010, unknown): “…should be noted that the quasi‐two‐day wave with wavenumber 3 is usually observed in the MLT in the southern hemisphere during the “window period” of late January and February, when the atmospheric wind conditions allow the propagation and amplification of the wave [Plumb, 1981; Liu et al., 2004].”
September 2019 Antarctic Sudden Stratospheric Warming: Quasi‐6‐Day Wave Burst and Ionospheric Effects (2019, background): “Additionally, the wave can be excited/amplified172 in the middle atmosphere due to baroclinic/barotropic instability (Lieberman et al., 2003;173 H.-L. Liu et al., 2004; Meyer & Forbes, 1997).”