Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis

By Pekka J. Korhonen, Mikulás Luptácik. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004

621 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants (2009, positive): “Korhonen and Luptacik (2004) used several variants of DEA models to measure the eco-efficiency of 24 coal-fired power plants in a European country.”
An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance (2020, methodology): “This is in line with Korhonen and Luptacik (2004), Mandal and Madheswaran (2010), Picazo-Tadeo et al. (2014), Reinhard et al. (1999), among others.”
Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework (2016, background): “(ii) A second group of approaches extends models such as the fron- tier eco-efficiency models based on Korhonen and Luptacik (2004) and Lauwers (2009), which construct a production system where only undesirable outputs are used as inputs to produce the good output (Mahlberg, Luptacik, & Sahoo,…”
Does industrial upgrading promote eco-efficiency? ─A panel space estimation based on Chinese evidence (2021, background): “, 2014; Chang, 2015; Li et al., 2017). Previous studies use indicators such as factor input density, percentage changes in clean and polluting industries. Although such indicators could reflect the direction of industrial restructure to some extent, they fail to capture the optimization and upgradin”