Relative Capability and Rebel Objective in Civil War

By Halvard Buhaug. 2006

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee4b2ac7325350265c4f339b3106ed5b9ecc99f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Isak Svensson
2. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
3. Halvard Buhaug
4. Stephen F. Knack

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Isak Svensson
2. Halvard Buhaug
3. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
4. Christopher Claassen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Isak Svensson
2. Halvard Buhaug
3. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
4. A. Tollefsen
5. Gudrun Østby
6. Christopher Claassen
7. Stephen F. Knack

Citations in the corpus

• Who Brings Which Peace? (2009, background): “By contrast, when the fight is not over the whole territory but only parts of it, then it is more likely that governments will be willing to make concessions (Buhaug 2006; Öberg 2002).15”
• It’s the Local Economy, Stupid! Geographic Wealth Dispersion and Conflict Outbreak Location (2011, background): “The specific aims of rebel groups can be ambiguous and difficult to establish and may remain in flux (see Buhaug 2006; Collier 2007; Sobek and Payne 2010).”