RIPL – Reference Input Parameter Library for Calculation of Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Data Evaluations

By R. Capote, M. Herman, P. Obložinský, P. Young, S. Goriely, T. Belgya, A. Ignatyuk, A. Koning, Stéphane Hilaire, V. Plujko and 13 more. 2009

1,180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

STANDARD BIG BANG NUCLEOSYNTHESIS UP TO CNO WITH AN IMPROVED EXTENDED NUCLEAR NETWORK (2011, methodology): “IMMPS07: Iocco et al. (2007) C3 code. a “Initial” corresponds to original network before re-evaluations of selected reaction rates “improved” (see the text). et al. 1999), where the resonance parameters and their uncertainties in the compound nucleus 12C are taken from the RIPL-3 Table 4 Network Rea”
IAEA Photonuclear Data Library 2019 (2019, methodology): “For each evaluated nucleus, we have investigated which of the MLO1, MLO2, SLO and SMLO closed-forms for E1 γ-ray strength functions [58] implemented in EMPIRE reproduces best the experimental data.”
Future of nuclear fission theory (2020, methodology): “On the one hand, there are barrier heights data (Capote et al 2009, Smirenkin 1993), which have to be interpreted with some caution as in one way or the other the available values were obtained via intermediate models (Capote et al 2009).”
ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data (2011, methodology): “A modified Lorenzian (MLO) radiativestrength function for all tungsten isotopes was taken as recommended by Plujko [85] and resulted in excellent agreement with the selected experimental neutron capture database in the fast neutron range.”