Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index

486 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Monitoring bank performance in the presence of risk (2014, unknown): “The joint treatment of good and bad outputs is a current trend in the banking literature (Park and Weber 2006; Fukuyama and Weber 2010; Barros et al. 2012), and—to name just another research stream—is widely employed for environmental studies (Färe et al. 2004; Kumar 2006; Sueyoshi and Goto 2011).”
A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index (2010, unknown): “Kumar (2006) employs the ML index to analyze the environmentally sensitive productivity growth of 41 countries for the period between 1973 and 1992.”
A sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index : Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology (2010, unknown): “In Kumar (2006) the half of sample countries showed technical regress, and in Zhou et al. (2010) rates of technical change is negative in almost half of the studied period.”
'Green' productivity growth in China's industrial economy (2014, background): “…for example, Boyd et al. (2002) and Picazo-Tadeo et al. (2005); at the industry level see Färe et al. (2001), Shestalova's (2003), Camioto et al. (2014) and Olanrewaju et al. (2012); and at the country level see Jeon and Sickles (2004), Kumar (2006) and a comprehensive survey by Zhou et al. (2008).”