Recent global trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia, and survival with dementia

By M. Prince, Gemma-Claire Ali, M. Guerchet, A. Prina, E. Albanese, Yu-Tzu Wu. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 2016

752 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundCurrent projections of the scale of the coming dementia epidemic assume that the age- and sex-specific prevalence of dementia will not vary over time, and that population ageing alone (increasing the number of older people at risk) drives the projected increases. The basis for this assumption is doubtful, and secular trends (that is, gradual decreases or increases in prevalence over long-term periods) are perfectly plausible.MethodsWe carried out a systematic review of studies of trends in prevalence, incidence and mortality for people with dementia, conducted since 1980.ResultsWe identified nine studies that had tracked dementia prevalence, eight that had tracked dementia incidence, and four that had tracked mortality among people with dementia. There was some moderately consistent evidence to suggest that the incidence of dementia may be declining in high-income countries. Evidence on trends in the prevalence of dementia were inconsistent across studies and did not suggest any clear overall effect. Declining incidence may be balanced by longer survival with dementia, although mortality trends have been little studied. There is some evidence to suggest increasing prevalence in East Asia, consistent with worsening cardiovascular risk factor profiles, although secular changes in diagnostic criteria may also have contributed.ConclusionsWe found no evidence to suggest that the current assumption of constant age-specific prevalence of dementia over time is ill-founded. However, there remains some uncertainty as to the future scale of the dementia epidemic. Population ageing seems destined to play the greatest role, and prudent policymakers should plan future service provision based upon current prevalence projections. Additional priorities should include investing in brain health promotion and dementia prevention programs, and monitoring the future course of the epidemic to chart the effectiveness of these measures.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee20f8dba4eca032509059915c7978a50ab427d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

  1. Ingmar Skoog

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. C. Qiu
  2. Monique M. B. Breteler
  3. Laura Fratiglioni
  4. Kenneth M. Langa

Citations in the corpus