Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology

By Michael Eid, E. Diener. 2005

460 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee0e5bb8df614d4799c0d0f697cf1e8ca75a860d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Proyer
2. D. Paulhus
3. Willibald F. Ruch
4. M. Back
5. Claudia Buschor
6. Simine Vazire
7. Rosalia E. Warbasse
8. Erica Y. Chu

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Paulhus
2. M. Back
3. D. Yeager
4. Boris Egloff
5. Phil Wood
6. Willibald F. Ruch
7. Simine Vazire
8. R. Proyer

Citations in the corpus

• Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes (2015, background): “Although time and money are never as ample as would be ideal, a multimethod approach to measurement can dramatically increase reliability and validity (Eid & Diener, 2006; Rushton, Brainerd, & Pressley, 1983).”
• Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? (2013, background): “A further explanation of this finding might be that certain aspects of character strengths are comparatively more difficult to observe and describe in others (cf. Allik, Realo, Mõttus, & Kuppens, 2010; Lucas & Baird, 2006).”