Does “No” Really Mean “No” After You Say “Yes”?

By C. Monson, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Tisha Binderup. 2000

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee07364e9f408e7ce2f3bd06a13e736393a3a001

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. S. Ben-David
2. Ofra Schneider
3. Mark Whatley

In Gender Studies

1. Louise Ellison
2. V. Munro
3. S. Ben-David
4. Ofra Schneider
5. Mark Whatley
6. F. Leverick
7. D. Robinson
8. T. Maurer

In Health

1. S. Ben-David
2. Ofra Schneider
3. Louise Ellison
4. Mark Whatley
5. V. Munro

Citations in the corpus

• Rape Perceptions, Gender Role Attitudes, and Victim-Perpetrator Acquaintance (2005, methodology): “…to mitigate the seriousness of sexual assault (Bell et al., 1994; Bridges, 1991; Burt, 1980; Caron & Carter, 1997; Check & Malamuth, 1983; Ewoldt et al., 2000; Feild, 1978; Feldman-Summers & Lindner, 1976; Freetly & Kane, 1995; Johnson et al., 1997; Lonsway & Fitzgerald, 1994; Monson et al., 2000).”
• Sexual Consent in Heterosexual Relationships: Development of a New Measure (2007, background): “Secondly, research on sexual precedence has suggested that having previously had sex with a partner is perceived as an obligation to continue sexual activity on subsequent occasions ( Monson et al. 2000; Shotland and Goodstein 1992).”
• The Effect of Participant Sex, Victim Dress, and Traditional Attitudes on Causal Judgments for Marital Rape Victims (2005, background): “Although no specific hypotheses were generated for these variables, the results of these additional analyses were consistent with past research (e.g., Merrell, 1998; Monson et al., 2000).”
• The Role of Sexual Precedence in Verbal Sexual Coercion (2004, methodology): “Because sexual precedence has been shown influence the interpretation of sexual behavior and the tactics used to perpetrate sexual assault (e.g., Monson et al., 2000; Shotland & Goodstein, 1992), we were interested in exploring the role of sexual precedence in verbal sexual coercion.”
• Of ‘Normal Sex’ and ‘Real Rape’: Exploring The Use of Socio-Sexual Scripts in (Mock) Jury Deliberation (2009, background): “…responsibility’ for having been raped in situations in which her previous behaviour may be seen as ‘flirtatious’ or ‘risky’ (Barber, 1974; Schult and Schneider, 1991; Shotland and Goodstein, 1992; Yescavage, 1999; Monson et al., 2000; Amnesty International, 2005; Cameron and Murphy, 2008).”