Rapid Sampling of Hydrogen Bond Networks for Computational Protein Design

By Jack B. Maguire, Scott E. Boyken, David Baker, Brian Kuhlman. 2018

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Hydrogen bond networks play a critical role in determining the stability and specificity of biomolecular complexes, and the ability to design such networks is important for engineering novel structures, interactions, and enzymes. One key feature of hydrogen bond networks that makes them difficult to rationally engineer is that they are highly cooperative and are not energetically favorable until the hydrogen bonding potential has been satisfied for all buried polar groups in the network. Existing computational methods for protein design are ill-equipped for creating these highly cooperative networks because they rely on energy functions and sampling strategies that are focused on pairwise interactions. To enable the design of complex hydrogen bond networks, we have developed a new sampling protocol in the molecular modeling program Rosetta that explicitly searches for sets of amino acid mutations that can form self-contained hydrogen bond networks. For a given set of designable residues, the protocol often identifies many alternative sets of mutations/networks, and we show that it can readily be applied to large sets of residues at protein-protein interfaces or in the interior of proteins. The protocol builds on a recently developed method in Rosetta for designing hydrogen bond networks that has been experimentally validated for small symmetric systems, but was not extensible to many larger protein structures and complexes. The sampling protocol we describe here not only recapitulates previously validated designs with performance improvements, but also yields viable hydrogen bond networks for cases where the previous method fails, such as the design of large, asymmetric interfaces relevant to engineering protein-based therapeutics.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Xingjie Pan
  2. Po-Ssu Huang
  3. Alexander Derry
  4. Raphael R. Eguchi
  5. Russ B. Altman
  6. Namrata Anand
  7. Alexander Rives
  8. Yilun Du

In Molecular Biology

  1. Xingjie Pan
  2. Namrata Anand
  3. Po-Ssu Huang
  4. Raphael R. Eguchi
  5. Alexander Derry
  6. Russ B. Altman
  7. Tanja Kortemme
  8. Alexander Rives

Citations in the corpus