Enhancing the relevance of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research
By Bas J. van Ruijven, Marc Levy, Arun Agrawal, Frank Biermann, J. Birkmann, T. Carter, K. Ebi, Matthias Garschagen, Bryan Jones, Roger A. C. Jones and 14 more. Climatic Change, 2014
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper discusses the role and relevance of the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and the new scenarios that combine SSPs with representative concentration pathways (RCPs) for climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (IAV) research. It first provides an overview of uses of social–environmental scenarios in IAV studies and identifies the main shortcomings of earlier such scenarios. Second, the paper elaborates on two aspects of the SSPs and new scenarios that would improve their usefulness for IAV studies compared to earlier scenario sets: (i) enhancing their applicability while retaining coherence across spatial scales, and (ii) adding indicators of importance for projecting vulnerability. The paper therefore presents an agenda for future research, recommending that SSPs incorporate not only the standard variables of population and gross domestic product, but also indicators such as income distribution, spatial population, human health and governance.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edefce9342e234966186d0e9da31885a737f286b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments (2017, methodology): “There are also otheroptions forobtaining data; for example,many have downscaled global or macro-regional socioeconomic scenarios (van Ruijven et al 2014, Viguié et al 2014), and data can also be gathered using participatorymethods, surveys and interviews (Tellman et al 2015, Ordóñez and Duinker…”