Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis.

By Yoichi Inaba, Jennifer A. Chen, Steven R. Bergmann. Atherosclerosis, 2011

739 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ede911e06848e0a621cc314ee825a10c66e002db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. T. Naqvi
2. Ming-Sum Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Protocol and quality assurance for carotid imaging in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank: development and assessment (2017, neutral): “61 for CIMT as a predictor of myocardial infarction over an average of eight years in a large meta-analysis).(24) As the assessment of plaque is much more subjective, it is both operator dependent and time consuming.”
• Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. (2014, background): “Measurement of carotid plaque alone was more predictive of CV events than either IMT phenotype in a meta-analysis (67,68).”