Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective
By H. Brown. 2005
403 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eddd503f10d9ec432d7b0785596e7e93bc286e69
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Stefano Liberati
- Christopher G. Timpson
- Erik Curiel
- David Wallace
- M. Janssen
- Gregg Jaeger
- Grigory E. Volovik
- D. Mattingly
Citations in the corpus
- Tests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update (2013, background): “The above premises lay down the basic elements for an axiomatic derivation of the Lorentz transformations [22, 23, 24], here we shall discuss it following the logic proposed in [25].”
- Explanation, understanding, and control (2014, unknown): “…example, one can provide both a geometrical as well as a dynamical explanation of length contraction and time dilation in Special Relativity (Balashov and Janssen 2003; Brown and Pooley 2006; Brown 2005), and despite having identical consequences these explanations each appear uniquely informative.”
- Quantum Mechanics on Spacetime I: Spacetime State Realism (2009, background): “3 The conclusion also follows from Brown’s thesis ([2005]) that a spacetime’s structure is just a description of its dynamics.”
- Drawing the line between kinematics and dynamics in special relativity (2009, background): “Brown (2005) characterizes the Minkowski metric as ''no more than a codification of the behaviour of rods and clocks'' (p. 9).”
- A Primer on Energy Conditions (2014, background): “Even direct experimental verification of the Casimir effect does not yield direct measurement of negative energy densities, though the Casimir effect relies essentially on the existence of such; rather, the negative energy densities are inferred from measurement of the Casimir force itself (Brown an”