Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener and Norbert Schwarz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundation of Hedonic Psychology.

By Joar Vittersø. 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edd716859d57517fe3d31ba05d13e73369a5bc3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

In History and Philosophy of Science

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

“Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development (2005, unknown): “Importantly, ample empirical evidence documenting the causal relationships between authenticity, vital engagement, and eudaimonic well-being is available (Kahneman et al., 1999; Kernis, 2003; Ryan & Deci, 2000; Sheldon & Elliot, 1999; Sheldon et al., 2004).”
Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being (2010, result): “In contrast, in many careful experiments and surveys, psychologists have actually studied whether people are successful in forecasting utility which they were about to experience (for reviews, see Loewenstein and Schkade 1999; Wilson and Gilbert 2003; Kahneman and Thaler 2006).”
Reconsidering happiness: a eudaimonist's perspective (2008, background): “Again while the concern expressed by Kashdan et al. (2008) may be valid with respect to Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia, the work of contemporary eudaimonist philosophers render this concern moot.”
The role of income aspirations in individual happiness (2004, unknown): “With the help of a single question or several questions on global self-reports, it is possible to get indications of individuals’ evaluation of their life satisfaction or happiness (Diener et al. 1999, Kahneman et al. 1999).”
Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married? (2006, methodology): “We directly study spouses’ level of utility and use reported subjective well-being as a proxy measure.5 Although this is not (yet) standard in economics, indicators of happiness or subjective well-being are increasingly 3 Selection effects into marriage are studied e.g. byMastekaasa (1992).”
Functional Capacity and Self–Evaluation of Health and Life of Oldest Old in China (2002, background): “Kahneman, Diener, and Schwarz (1999) propose five conceptual levels as relevant for research on well-being: (a) External (“objective”) conditions (e.g., income, neighborhood, housing), (b) Subjective well-being (e.g., self-reports of satisfaction/dissatisfaction), (c) Persistent mood level (e.g.,…”