Exchange Rate Regimes in the Modern Era: Fixed, Floating, and Flaky

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

If the Fed Sneezes, Who Catches a Cold? (2017, background): “However, Rose (2011) finds that the macroeconomic and financial consequences of exchange rate regime choices are surprisingly inconsequential.”
Exchange Rate Management and Crisis Susceptibility: A Reassessment (2014, unknown): “4See Frankel, Schmukler, and Serven (2000), Ghosh, Ostry, and Tsangarides (2010), Klein and Shambaugh (2010), and Rose (2011) for a discussion.”
The Real Exchange Rate and Economic Growth: Revisiting the Case Using External Instruments (2017, background): “Finally, in the last column of the table we test whether our results are driven to a large extent by the global 15An additional caveat is that any exchange rate classification regime is subject to a significant measurement error (Rose 2011).”
A Tie That Binds: Revisiting the Trilemma in Emerging Market Economies (2017, unknown): “8Our paper is thus also related to the voluminous literature examining the “neutrality” of nominal exchange rate regimes, which has produced mixed findings about their impact on macroeconomic variables such as trade, output, and inflation (Baxter & Stockman, 1989; Ghosh, Ostry, & Tsangarides, 2010; ”