Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching

By Daniel Read, Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma. 2003

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edcd6f9b14326ab18ec75b2146c5eac53a63e0b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. L. Read
2. Daniel Read
3. Ariel Rubinstein
4. Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma

In General Decision Sciences

1. N. L. Read
2. Daniel Read
3. Ariel Rubinstein
4. Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma

Citations in the corpus

• How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods (2013, unknown): “As shown in Table 1 and consistent with prior results (Ahlbrecht & Weber, 1997; Read & Roelofsma, 2003), financial discount rates measured with the choice-based methods (titration and multiple-staircase) were generally higher than discount rates measured with matching, and this was particularly true…”
• Time discounting over the lifespan (2004, background): “Rather, they assume they will spend money as and when they receive it ( Read & Powell, 2002 ).”