${\bf S}_{3}$: A Spectral and Spatial Measure of Local Perceived Sharpness in Natural Images
By Cuong T. Vu, Thien D. Phan, Damon M. Chandler. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2012
392 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edc8a869c18c84cd8e4956de4e27b5bdd8b27d52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Blind Quality Assessment Based on Pseudo-Reference Image (2018, background): “A spectral and spatial sharpness (S3) was proposed in [24].”
- Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Data (2018, background): “Actually, these years have seen quite a few works dedicated to sharpness assessment [50, 51, 52].”
- Sharpness-Aware Low-Dose CT Denoising Using Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (2017, background): “gradient [55], local binary pattern [69], power spectrum slope [55, 62], discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficient [21].”
- No-Reference Image Sharpness Assessment in Autoregressive Parameter Space (2015, methodology): “Comparison of local sharpness maps of ground truth, S3, FISHbb and NFEQM using representative images in [17].”