Scaling of Precipitation Extremes over a Wide Range of Climates Simulated with an Idealized GCM
By P. O’Gorman, Tapio Schneider. 2009
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edc01ce4450e626692e6381364aa6d77444474b4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change (2009, methodology): “To reduce noise, the conditional mean of the temperature Te and the upward velocity !e for a given percentile of precipitation was taken over all days and longitudes for which the precipitation lies in a finite range, chosen for the nth percentile as the range between the 100 " (3/2)(100 " n) and 10”
- Using Machine Learning to Parameterize Moist Convection: Potential for Modeling of Climate, Climate Change, and Extreme Events (2018, background): “This idealized GCM configuration (but with a simpler convection scheme) has previously been found to be useful for investigations of moist atmospheric dynamics and the response of precipitation to climate change [e.g., O’Gorman and Schneider , 2009; O’Gorman , 2011; Dwyer and O’Gorman , 2017].”
- Energetic Constraints on Precipitation Under Climate Change (2012, background): “…(Allen and Ingram 2002; Trenberth et al. 2003; Pall et al. 2007); recent results suggest that vertical gradients of specific humidity or surface specific humidities are relevant for precipitation extremes (O’Gorman and Schneider 2009a, b; Schneider et al. 2010; Muller et al. 2011; Romps 2011).”
- WATER VAPOR AND THE DYNAMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGES (2009, background): “…contrast may scale as ∆q∗ ∼ ∂pq∗|θ∗e∆p, where the saturation specific humidity derivative is taken along a moist adiabat with constant equivalent potential temperature θ∗e , and the pressure difference ∆p is taken to be fixed [Betts and Harshvardhan, 1987; O’Gorman and Schneider, 2009a, b].”