PROV-O: The PROV Ontology
By Timothy Lebo, S. Sahoo, Deborah L. McGuinness, Khalid Belhajjame, J. Cheney, D. Corsar, Daniel Garijo, S. Soiland-Reyes, S. Zednik, Jun Zhao. 2013
769 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eda43fb05a761ef32b172791f01e50192ea64216
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Denny Vrandečić
- Markus Krötzsch
- Krzysztof Janowicz
- Fredo Erxleben
- A. Haller
- S. Cox
- Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
- Michael Günther
Citations in the corpus
- Introducing Wikidata to the Linked Data Web (2014, methodology): “To relate statements to references, we use the property wasDerivedFrom from the W3C PROV Ontology [13].”
- GERBIL - Benchmarking Named Entity Recognition and Linking consistently (2017, methodology): “35 http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/ G ERBIL uses the recently proposed DataID [3] ontology that combines VoID [1] and DCAT [36] metadata with Prov-O [33] provenance information and ODRL [30] licenses to describe datasets.”
- SOSA: A Lightweight Ontology for Sensors, Observations, Samples, and Actuators (2018, methodology): “The core structure aligns well with other activity-centric standard ontologies such as the OGC Observations and Measurements [13] (i.e. Observation ≡ so19156-om:OM Observation ) and the PROV Ontology [20] (i.e. Observation (cid:118) prov:Activity ).”