Additions

By F. Odqvist. 1975

This treatise was an authoritative account of the subject of metallic creep when first published in 1966. It retains this standing in its second edition, which cites some fifty new references and includes some account of new developments, in particular of means of obtaining "bounds" to creep deformation. The mathematical analysis of creep is not a simple matter. However, Professor Odqvist presents a comprehensive coverage of all its aspects. He is a master of the "possible". His basic laws are as simple as it is possible to make them, but not so idealised as to lose touch with the results of experiment. Much attention is in fact given to experimental verification of both laws and solutions based upon them. His methods of analysis are straightforward and lead to the solution of a representative range of problems. Engineers with more complex practical problems will find here a sure basis from which to tackle, for example, step-by-step type calculations on the digital computer. In many practical situations it is sufficient to obtain good estimates of creep deformation and time to rupture. Some fourteen new pages of text are devoted to a review of work on this important new topic carried out by Hil l , Martin, Palmer, Ponter and Leckie. The account given shows something of the basis of this work and derives some of the results. It will reveal to the interested reader new possibilities of approximate analysis, which wil l send him to the original sources for more information and, hopefully, inspire him to break new ground himself. The mathematical theory of creep still remains an empirically based branch of continuum mechanics. Metal physics has not yet succeeded in providing a theoretical foundation. Even if it does the result may be too complex for mathematical exploitation. Prof Odqvist's formulation is likely to remain the standard treatment for years to come. W. S. HEMP

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. José Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez
  2. Sergio Vazquez
  3. Pierre Pinson
  4. Patricio Cortes
  5. Leopoldo García Franquelo
  6. Gabriele Pannocchia
  7. Andreas Krause
  8. Marco Zugno

Citations in the corpus