Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests
By Eric K. Zenner. 2000
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed9bdf729ffdf31db6ce8128903f8a1eaebc8fd5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
- Jürgen Bauhus
- Janet Franklin
- Phillip B. Gibbons
- MJ. Mazurek
- W. Zielinski
- Brian Palik
- William S. Keeton
- Daniel N. M. Donoghue
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Phillip B. Gibbons
- Cris Brack
- C. McElhinny
- Janet Franklin
- John A. Stanturf
- MJ. Mazurek
- W. Zielinski
- Brian Palik
Citations in the corpus
- Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function (2014, background): “ing scattered older individuals (Zenner, 2000; Franklin et al., 2002; Schmiegelow et al., 2006), as well as age structures best described as two-cohort (Wallenius et al.”
- Individual legacy trees influence vertebrate wildlife diversity in commercial forests (2004, background): “In addition, horizontal structural complexity increased in stands containing residuals (Zenner, 2000).”
- DO REMNANT OLD‐GROWTH TREES ACCELERATE RATES OF SUCCESSION IN MATURE DOUGLAS‐FIR FORESTS? (2005, background): “This study adds to a growing body of research (Hansen et al. 1995, Acker et al. 1998, Zenner 2000) on the role of biological legacies in latesuccessional processes.”
- Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement (2005, background): “Variation in tree height is considered an important attribute of structure because stands containing a variety of tree heights are also likely to contain a variety of tree ages and species thereby providing a diversity of micro-habitats for wildlife (Zenner, 2000).”