Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating Human Psychopathology (2004, background): “In what follows, however, it is important to recognize that ACT is a complex and multi-faceted form of psychotherapy, and thus the current interpretations must be seen as no more than a heuristic for further conceptual and empirical RFT analyses of ACT (e.g., Pankey & Hayes, 2003 ).”
A review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. (2010, unknown): “…and couples problems (Biglan, 1989; Peterson, Eifert, Feingold, & Davidson, 2009), patients with intellectual disabilities (Brown & Hooper, 2009; Pankey & Hayes, 2004) exhibitionism (Paul, Marx, & Orsillo, 1999), sexual dysfunction and orientation (Montesinos, 2003), alcoholism (Luciano, Gómez,…”
Acceptance: An Historical and Conceptual Review (2010, background): “…use with a range of disorders, including anxiety (e.g., Roemer & Orsillo, 2007), depression (e.g., Kanter, Baruch, & Gaynor, 2006), psychosis (e.g., Pankey & Hayes, 2003), personality disorder (e.g., Gratz & Gunderson, 2006; Linehan et al., 1991), chronic pain (e.g., McCracken & Eccleston, 2006),…”